One critic stated they could not connect to this
book; therefore, the critic found they could not connect to the characters and
relationships after the protagonist, Jacob’s parents died. Further this critic
lost all interest in Jacob’s life as part of the circus. The critic stated the
book was well-written, but the idea did not feel compelling. It was this particular
critic, who helped me sort my own feelings out towards Sara Gruen’s Water for Elephants.
The writing was strong, particularly towards the
circus images showing a less glamorous side, one the audience is unaware of
when they bring their families to the see the show. A couple of years ago, I
went with my children to one of the last Ringling Brothers shows, and the
contrast in description, note the time period differences, gave meaning to a
complimentary color scheme. Mine and my children’s experience breathed breathtaking
vibrant orange, while the show behind the mask in Gruen’s book cooled off to a
dark, black blue hues. With that said, I can appreciate great descriptive,
especially those placing the reader in time period with brutal honesty.
Despite the writing, I still could not connect
to this story and this line of thinking lead me back to the reason I decided to
read it in the first place, and that reasoning lead to falling in love with a
protagonist who struggles against the time period’s hardships to achieve the
unbending dream. I liked Jacob, but unlike characters like Lennie and George,
also set against the backdrop of The Depression, the dream was missing. For
Lennie and George in Steinbeck’s Of Mice
and Men, there was the constant dream of owning your own farm. With the
obstacles of history, where money and work to achieve this dream was anything but
hopeful, these two men still hoped.
I think Gruen’s Water for Elephants was missing that thread of hope that bleeds
through a novel, often making a reader think the protagonist might bleed out
taking their dreams with them, and leaving the reader devastated. If Gruen
could have found that thread, this book would be classic. Jacob’s love for
Marlena, the romantic thread did not work simply because the reasons for
falling in love seemed superficial and a matter of convenience. Perhaps more could
have been placed on Rosie, the elephant the two characters loved, putting Rosie
as a catalyst for their love but this connection seemed forced at best. With that
said, Rosie could have been my favorite character, and I wish I had seen more
of her.
I do recommend the book. It is loaded with
beautiful descriptions of the truth behind the circus during the 1930’s. It
also has Rosie, the elephant who needs the water of hope, because she certainly
in unappreciated and thirsty for freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment